Jul 20, 2022Liked by David Thunder

I am still locked out of my account for repeat violations of the same policy of contradicting "global health authorities". I don't even know who specifically these authorities are that I am not supposed to contradict! WHO? CDC/FDA? EMA? Gates? Or actual scientists?

Expand full comment

I've had very similar experiences, I'm sorry to say. They're hopelessly inconsistent too, one never knows where they stand.

Expand full comment

Linkedin is owned by the same people that brought us patents #10130701b2 and Wo2020060606A1.


Expand full comment

Time to LinkOut. I did. LinkedIn finally got useful and interesting during the "pandemic" after 12 years being listed, and then the warnings and scoldings and censorship. And this tends to be a serious group of professionals who were reaching out to solve a problem. You know actually trying to Link In.

Check in with Steve Kirsch who is pondering suing Twitter. Maybe they both should be sued simultaneously? The time is right. Elon Musk opened a few cans of worms to get the process started.


Expand full comment

Censorship is equivalent to an 8-year-old brat shouting "If you don't let me win, I'm taking my ball and going home!" Objective adults with defensible opinions refuse to "play ball with" such children.

There is no such thing as "settled science" or "scientific consensus". No serious scientist uses such laughable terminology.

Science welcomes vigorous, objective debate of ideas and data. Test your audience with the words: "Are you open to the possibility that (a seemingly outrageous claim) might be true?". If they answer with "No, that cannot possibly be true", you know that they are not able to open their mind and abandon their "confirmation bias".

All learning ceases when so-called adults refuse to consider ... the possibility ... that they are wrong.

Expand full comment