Few high-ranking officials closely involved in the decision-making process that led to lockdowns have come clean on what really happened or how it came to pass that this giant social experiment was conceived and implemented.
I certainly wouldn't see him as a hero, but I think his testimony on what went on, albeit politically motivated in part, can shed some valuable light on how dishonest and politicised the whole process was.
He’s disingenuous though. If this was such a travesty, why didn’t he go public earlier? Maybe he could have prevented at least some of it.
I certainly wouldn't see him as a hero, but I think his testimony on what went on, albeit politically motivated in part, can shed some valuable light on how dishonest and politicised the whole process was.